A three-month trial that recently ended in Liverpool, where nine Muslim men were found guilty of raping dozens of British children, revealed that police and social workers in northern England repeatedly refuse to investigate Muslim paedophile gangs: they said they are afraid of being called racist.

The disturbing details that emerged during the trial have opened yet another chapter in a long-running debate about multiculturalism in Britain, where many say that political correctness has gone too far.

Less than a month after the trial in Liverpool ended on May 9, it emerged that social workers in the City of Rotherham, also in northern England, had known for six years that a teenage mother (identified as Child S) who was murdered for bringing shame on the families of two Pakistani men who had used her for sex, was at clear risk from predatory Muslim gangs.

On May 29, Rotherham Council’s Safeguarding Children Board published a so-called Serious Case Review, but key politically incorrect passages which reveal that they had known she was at particular risk from «Asian men» (Muslim men) were blocked out with black lines.

The council went to court in an attempt to suppress the hidden information after an uncensored copy of the report was leaked to a British newspaper, but the legal action was eventually abandoned. The uncensored report confirmed that Child S had pursued dealings with 15 different agencies, and identified «numerous missed opportunities» to protect her; observers believe the agencies failed to do so because they did not want to be branded as racist.

Other cases of political correctness abound in Britain, where the enforcement of multiculturalism is endangering the exercise of free speech, threatening public order and undermining British culture.

In Leicester, a gang of Somali Muslim women, who assaulted and nearly killed a non-Muslim passer-by in the city center, walked free after a politically correct judge decided that as Muslims, the women were «not used to being drunk.»

In London, two Muslims, who laughed as they repeatedly raped a 24-year-old woman, had their sentences slashed after politically correct judges at an appeals court ruled that the men were not «dangerous.»

In Wiltshire, police pulled over an 18-year-old driver for a routine spot check. The driver was stunned when a police officer ordered him to remove the Flag of England from his car; apparently they said the flag could be deemed racist and offensive to Muslim immigrants. The driver thought the officer was joking until he was threatened with a £30 fine if he refused to remove it from view. Tory MP Philip Davies, who campaigns against political correctness, said: «How on earth can it be racist to fly your own flag in your own country?»

In Southampton, a racism row broke out after taxi passengers complained that foreign drivers could not understand English. A group of drivers responded by placing stickers in their taxis with the Flag of England, reading «English Speaking Driver» (photo here). The signs, however, were branded as «racist and offensive» by Town Hall officials, who threatened to strip the drivers of their operating license — and their livelihood — if they refused to remove them.

In Manchester, a 14-year-old girl was arrested by police for racism after refusing to sit with a group of five Asian students who did not speak English. The incident happened after the girl asked her teacher if she could switch groups because the Asian students were talking in Urdu, a language she did not understand. The teacher apparently responded by shouting at her, «It’s racist, you’re going to get done by the police.» After being fingerprinted and photographed, the girl was forced to spend three-and-a-half hours in a police cell on suspicion of committing a «section five racial public order offense.»

In Irlam, Greater Manchester, a ten-year-old boy was brought before a court for allegedly calling an 11-year-old mixed-race pupil a «Paki» and «Bin Laden» in a playground argument at a primary school. When the case came before District Judge Jonathan Finestein, he said: «Have we really got to the stage where we are prosecuting 10-year-old boys because of political correctness? There are major crimes out there and the police don’t bother to prosecute.» Finestein also said the decision to prosecute, which cost taxpayers £25,000 in legal fees, showed «how stupid the whole system is getting.»

In London, social workers have been accused of «misguided political correctness» after they considered sending a boy in their care to the Democratic Republic of Congo for an exorcism. Officials at Islington Council in north London considered sending the African boy to the Congo when his mother claimed he was possessed by evil spirits and needed «deliverance.» City officials paid Dr. Richard Hoskins, an expert in African religion, over £4,000 to travel to Africa to investigate the possibility of an exorcism; evidently they were worried the family’s «sensibilities might be affected.» Hoskins completed the trip and advised the council against have the boy exorcised because the rituals can be «violent…deeply disturbing and traumatizing.»

In Kent, a Christian doctor is fighting for his job after he told a suicidal patient that Christianity may offer help. According to the doctor, «The man was depressed, and had left his own faith. So I told him, ‘You may find that Christianity offers you something that your own faith did not.'» The General Medical Council (GMC), which regulates standards among medical professionals, issued the doctor a warning, claiming he had «overstepped the line.» The GMC, which allows doctors to promote the healing effects of homoeopathy, chiropractic and reiki, also known as palm healing — all of which are unsupported by Western, evidence-based medicine but are backed by belief systems — has banned the mention of faith and prayer in a consultation.

The British Navy, which has been forced to downsize its fleet due to military budget cuts, was obliged by diktats of political correctness to install a special Satanist chapel onboard one of its warships to accommodate the religious requirements of a Satanist crewman.

In London, the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) — a key promoter of multiculturalism — recently announced that it would drop the terms BC (Before Christ) and AD (which translates from the Latin «Anno Domini» to » in the year of our Lord») and replaced them with the «religiously-neutral» Before the Common Era, BCE, and Common Era, CE. The BBC justified its move this way: «As the BBC is committed to impartiality it is appropriate that we use terms that do not offend or alienate non-Christians.»

Anglican Bishop Michael Nazir-Ali, who resigned as the Bishop of Rochester amid death threats from Muslim extremists in Britain, says the BBC’s move «amounts to the dumbing down of the Christian basis of our culture, language and history.»

The BBC has also refused to broadcast a screenplay about the threat that Islam poses to freedom of speech. The BBC’s director general, Mark Thompson, said he would not air a play the National Theatre called «Can We Talk About This?» which examines multiculturalism and how it has resulted in Britain being more divided than ever.

According to Thompson, there is «a growing nervousness about discussion about Islam.» He also claims that because Muslims are a religious minority in Britain, their faith should be given different coverage than that of more established groups.

In 2005, Thompson famously ordered BBC Two to air an anti-Christian musical called «Jerry Springer: The Opera,» which mocked God and presented Jesus Christ as a homosexual. At least 45,000 people contacted the BBC to complain about the show, which contained an estimated 8,000 obscenities. According to one observer: «If this show portrayed Mohammed or Vishnu as homosexual, ridiculous and ineffectual, it would never have seen the light of day.»

Soeren Kern is Senior Fellow for European Politics at the Madrid-based Grupo de Estudios Estratégicos / Strategic Studies Group. Follow him on Facebook.

Britain Ruled by Political Correctness

by Soeren Kern
July 11, 2012 at 5:00 am


Vi i Document ønsker å legge til rette for en interessant og høvisk debatt om sakene som vi skriver om. Vennligst les våre retningslinjer for debattskikk før du deltar 🙂