Den romerske kurie under pave Frans har åpenbart ligget langt til venstre politisk. Når pavens rådgivere går ut og stempler Steve Bannon som «farlige fundmentalister» er det en eskalering av motsetninger innen kirken. Å sammenligne Bannon med islamsk fundamentalisme sier mer om pavens forhold til islam enn hans forståelse av amerikansk høyresiden.

Katolikker er normalt tilbakeholdne med å kritisere paven offentlig. Men pave Frans viser så klare politiske preferanser at han får svar. En av dem er George Neumayr som i mai skrev i Spectator at paven fyller toppostene i.Vatikanet med kommunister.

Pavens kritikk faller i god jord

President Donald Trumps sjefstrateg Steve Bannon og kristne ekstremister som står på Trumps side, omtales av pave Frans’ rådgivere som farlige fundamentalister.

Bannon, som er katolikk, tok i en tale i 2014 til orde for en ny kristen hellig krig. Pavens rådgivere Antonio Spadaro  (bildet) og Marcelo Figueroa viser til denne talen og beskriver Bannon som noen som ønsker «å legge staten under Bibelen på grunnlag av en logikk som ikke skiller seg fra den som inspirerer islamsk fundamentalisme».

Rådgiverne har også tatt for seg det de kaller «sjokkerende retorikk» på det amerikanske katolske nettstedet Church Militant, der Trumps valgseier over Hillary Clinton ble sammenlignet med Diokletians nederlag for Konstantin, Romerrikets første kristne keiser.

Spadaro er katolsk prest og redaktør av jesuittenes innflytelsesrike magasin. Figueroa er en protestant som redigerer den argentinske utgaven av Vatikanets avis L’Osservatore Romano. Spadaro og Figueroa er personlige venner og rådgivere til pave Frans. Deres kritikk mot Bannon og det ekstreme kristne høyre i USA ble publisert i en artikkel i tidsskriftet La Civilta Cattolica lørdag.

I en kommentar til søndagsutgaven av avisen La Republicca sier kirkehistoriker Alberto Melloni at pavens rådgivere med sin kritikk nå har avdekket en til nå uhørt konflikt mellom pave Frans, katolske evangelister og Trump-leiren. NTB-DPA

Svar på tiltale

Den 19. mai publiserte George Neumayer en bitende artikkel i the Specator:

The Pope’s Marxist Head of the Jesuits

Fr. Arturo Sosa Abascal, a Venezuelan Communist and Modernist, is carrying out Francis’s agenda.

Understanding the adage that personnel is policy, Pope Francis has been planting Marxists throughout the Church, including at the top of the troubled religious order to which he belongs. In 2016, the Jesuits, with the blessing of Pope Francis, installed as its general superior a Venezuelan, Fr. Arturo Sosa Abascal, whose communist convictions have long been known.

Sosa has written about the “Marxist mediation of the Christian Faith,” arguing that the Church should “understand the existence of Christians who simultaneously call themselves Marxists and commit themselves to the transformation of the capitalist society into a socialist society.” In 1989, he signed a letter praising Fidel Castro.

Turn down any corridor in Francis’s Vatican, and you are likely to run into a de facto communist: Francis has a communist running his order, a communist running his Council of Cardinals (the Honduran cardinal, Oscar Rodriguez Maradiaga), a communist running the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences (Margaret Archer, a British sociologist who has said that she represents the “Marxian left”), and communists such as the renegade Brazilian liberation theologian Leonardo Boff and the Canadian socialist Naomi Klein drafting his encyclicals.

It is no coincidence that the only U.S. presidential candidate who made a visit to the Vatican during the campaign was a socialist who had honeymooned in the Soviet Union. Bernie Sanders turned up at the Vatican in April 2016, having received an invitation from Pope Francis’s close Argentine friend, Bishop Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo.

“We invited the candidate who cites the pope most in the campaign, and that is Senator Bernie Sanders,” explained Sorondo, who added that Sanders’s agenda is “very analogous to that of the pope.”

In this smug leftist atmosphere in Rome, Sosa’s elevation to the head of the Jesuits was inevitable. In the past, the Jesuits had been called the pope’s marines. Under Sosa, they are more like the pope’s Marxists, peddling his climate-change propaganda as a pretext for global socialism.

But Sosa’s ambitions, like Pope Francis’s, go well beyond meddling in economies. He is also pushing a moral revolution in the Church, evident in his astonishing claim that, since none of the Apostles tape-recorded Jesus Christ, his words on adultery can be elastically re-interpreted.

“You need to start by reflecting on what exactly Jesus said,” Sosa told an Italian interviewer in February. “At that time, no one had a tape recorder to capture the words. What we know is that the words of Jesus have to be contextualized, they’re expressed in a certain language, in a precise environment, and they’re addressed to someone specific.”

In other words, Sosa is confident that he understands Jesus’s meaning better than the Gospel writers. Like Francis, Sosa can’t resist the mumbo-jumbo of Modernist biblical scholarship, which always manages to dovetail conveniently with liberal views.

The Council of Trent explicitly condemned the claim that the Gospel writers were just making stuff up when recounting the words of Jesus Christ. But Sosa has no problem trafficking in that heresy.

“Over the last century in the Church there has been a great blossoming of studies that seek to understand exactly what Jesus meant to say,” he said.

The presumption here is extraordinary but typical of a Francis acolyte. The new orthodoxy is heterodoxy, and Sosa is wallowing in it. He is given to little sermonettes on relativism, such as this whopper:

The Church has developed over the centuries, it is not a piece of reinforced concrete. It was born, it has learned, it has changed. This is why the ecumenical councils are held, to try to bring developments of doctrine into focus. Doctrine is a word that I don’t like very much, it brings with it the image of the hardness of stone. Instead the human reality is much more nuanced, it is never black or white, it is in continual development.

Were St. Ignatius of Loyola alive today, the order he founded wouldn’t ordain him, and he would have wondered how a de facto Protestant ended up on the chair of St. Peter. Nor would St. Ignatius have believed the sheer sophistry that now passes for theological “sophistication” in his order.

Fr. Antonio Spadaro, another Jesuit close to Pope Francis, tweeted out earlier this year this profundity: “Theology is not #Mathematics. 2 + 2 in #Theology can make 5. Because it has to do with #God and real #life of #people.”

Gobsmacked by the relentless leftism of Francis and his aides, Al Gore asked in 2015, “Is the pope Catholic?” The question is no longer a joke.

George Neumayr is the author of The Political Pope.

Vi i Document ønsker å legge til rette for en interessant og høvisk debatt om sakene som vi skriver om. Vennligst les våre retningslinjer for debattskikk før du deltar 🙂