USA hadde denne uken innbudt ni europeiske og ni muslimske land til å diskutere forholdet mellom ytringsfrihet og islam.
Obama-administrasjonen forsøker seg på en balansegang. Den er blitt mer krevende etter den arabiske våren og islamistenes fremgang ved valgene. Skal USA demme opp eller søke dialog, og hva er grensene for dialogen? Noen ser ikke noe problem i at USA er imøtekommende, andre mener tilpasningen har gått for langt.
Det har lenge vært en motsetning mellom vestlige land og muslimske land i synet på ytringsfrihet. Konferansenn av islamske stater, OIC, ønsker et forbud mot blasfemi. I våres droppet OIC kravet om forbud under en sesjon av Menneskerettsrådet. Det ble tatt som et fremskritt og tegn på en åpnere holdning.
Den arabiske våren har skapt en ny åpning og USA håper å kunne kapitalisere på den.
Nine European countries, three from Latin America and nine in the Organization of the Islamic Conference are among those that sent officials to the conference. The United Nations also is participating.
To critics, the three-day conference in Washington smacks of appeasement toward hardline Islamist governments with often dismal anti-discrimination records of their own. U.S. officials say they’re simply promoting education and understanding, while also rejecting any demands from Arab states and other countries that want restrictions on free speech.
“We know that some people distort various religious doctrines to justify intolerance, foment violence or create strife that serves their narrow political purposes,” said Suzan Johnson Cook, U.S. ambassador at large for international religious freedom. She said offensive speech ought to be denounced, but that “religion must never be used as an excuse to stifle freedom of expression.”
The dialogue comes after years of complaints from Muslim governments about perceived offenses against their faith. As examples they cite irreverent European cartoons of the prophet Muhammad and a small Florida church group’s burning of the Quran, and have advocated international rules to protect religious symbols and beliefs from mockery.
But the United States and European countries have sought to block what would essentially amount to an international ban on blasphemy that would be incompatible with free speech laws in the West.
American officials believe a compromise struck in March at the U.N. Human Rights Council broke the impasse. The divisive notion of interdicting “religious defamation” was dropped as countries agreed to work together to battle intolerance and the incitement of violence against people for their religious beliefs. And at an interfaith conference in July in Turkey, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton joined others in promoting the effort as a way to safeguard religious freedom without compromising free speech.
AP forhåndsomtalte konferansen og lar kritikerne slippe til. Ytringsfriheten står fortsatt sterkt i USA.
“Why is it that the U.S. Constitution must come second when representatives from Islamic countries such as Saudi Arabia and Pakistan demand we must curb our religious liberties and free speech?” asked Andrea Lafferty, president of the Traditional Values Coalition. “Why is our government bending to Taliban values here on the home front?”