Retorikken til IS er verdt et studium, man skal bare venne seg til de blomstrende, bloddryppende metaforene. Sheik Adnani som truet vestlige land og borgere i en tale 21, har mange «morsomme» uttrykk om blod: det finnes ikke noe som heter blod som er ulovlig å utgyte, hvis det er snakk om vantro. Enten de går i uniform eller ikke, enten de er sivile eller tjenstemenn. Deres blod er som hunders.
Kun én ting gjør blodet hellig: de troende.
Denne blodmystikken kan minne om nazistenes. Det er samme mystikk. Denne gang på religiøse kriterier, ikke biologiske. Men ummahen og Volksgemeinschaft har en del til felles. Og noen er utsett til enforcers, til å skille klinten fra hveten. De som er avfall skal bare brennes.
Men hvorfor ser ikke medier og eksperter disse parallellene, som er slående, hvis man først dveler ved dem.

Hitler taler ved åpningen av Huset for tysk kunst i München 18. juli 1937. Moderne kunst ble kalt «entartet», «utartet» og renset. Den skulle ikke forgifte tyske sinn.
Nazistene og salafistene har sans for det teatralske. Politikk som teater. Jihad-idoliseringen minner om nazistens dyrking av krigeren og de har fargen svart til felles. Dødens farge.
SITE reminds about the call by Islamic State (IS) spokesman, Abu Muhammad al-‘Adnani, to Muslims in Australia to carry out lone-wolf attacks against civilians.
‘Adnani’s audio speech from September 21, 2014, “Indeed, Your Lord is Ever Watchful,” served not only to rally IS fighters in Iraq and Syria against the U.S.-led coalition, but to mobilize jihadists in Western countries to execute operations abroad. He stated, for example, addressing Muslims and specifying those in Australia:
“So O muwahhid [monotheist], do not let this battle pass you by wherever you may be. You must strike the soldiers, patrons, and troops of the tawaghit [tyrant]. Strike their police, security, and intelligence members, as well as their treacherous agents. Destroy their beds. Embitter their lives for them and busy them with themselves. If you can kill a disbelieving American or European – especially the spiteful and filthy French – or an Australian, or a Canadian, or any other disbeliever from the disbelievers waging war, including the citizens of the countries that entered into a coalition against the Islamic State, then rely upon Allah, and kill him in any manner or way however it may be. Do not ask for anyone’s advice and do not seek anyone’s verdict. Kill the disbeliever whether he is civilian or military, for they have the same ruling. Both of them are disbelievers. Both of them are considered to be waging war (the civilian by belonging to a state waging war against the Muslims). Both of their blood and wealth is legal for you to destroy, for blood does not become illegal or legal to spill by the clothes being worn.
“The civilian outfit does not make blood illegal to spill, and the military uniform does not make blood legal to spill. The only things that make blood illegal and legal to spill are Islam and a covenant (peace treaty, dhimma, etc.). Blood becomes legal to spill through disbelief. So whoever is a Muslim, his blood and wealth are sanctified. And whoever is a disbeliever, his wealth is legal for a Muslim to take and his blood is legal to spill. His blood is like the blood of a dog; there is no sin for him in spilling it nor is there any blood money to be paid for doing such.”
