Sakset/Fra hofta

Daniel Pipes har en interessant kommentar om en ny bok som viser hvordan USA og Storbritannia har trodd de kunne bruke Det muslimske Brorskap som en motvekt til kommunismen. Men pengene gjorde det mulig for Brorskapet å etablere seg i Europa, tidsnok til å stille seg i spissen for muslimene da de innvandret.

Utgangspunktet er en ny bok: Ian Johnsen A Mosque in Munich: Nazis, the CIA, and the Rise of the Muslim Brotherhood in the West.

Nazistene rekrutterte sovjetiske muslimer til å slåss mot sovjetstyret. Disse skulle senere bli overtatt av Det muslimske Brorskap og Said Ramadan.

In a stunning piece of investigative historical research, Ian Johnson, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist formerly with the Wall Street Journal, reveals new twists and turns of this drama in his just-released book, A Mosque in Munich: Nazis, the CIA, and the Rise of the Muslim Brotherhood in the West (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, $27).

Gerhard von Mende

Johnson opens with a review of the systematic Nazi efforts to recruit Soviet Muslims from among their prisoners of war. Many Muslims loathed Stalin; and between 150,000 and 300,000 of them fought for the Axis in World War II. In other words, over and above their unfulfilled propaganda effort directed at Arabs, the Nazis actually fielded a substantial force of mainly Turkic Muslims under the leadership of a scholarly Nazi enthusiast named Gerhard von Mende.

After the German defeat in 1945, Johnson follows von Mende as he continued his anti-communist work with ex-Soviet Muslims, now in a Cold War context. But his network of former soldiers proved not very competent at the task of arousing Muslim hostility against the Soviet Union. Their leading intellectual, for example, had served as the imam of an SS division that helped suppress the Warsaw uprising of 1944. Islamists quickly proved themselves far more competent at this political and religious challenge. Johnson explains that they «wear suits, have university degrees, and can formulate their demands in ways that a politician can understand.»

The heart of his fascinating study lies in tracing the evolution, much of it in Munich, from old soldiers to new Islamists. It’s a classic tale of 1950s intrigue, complete with rehabilitated Nazis, CIA-front organizations, and dueling Soviet-American ambitions.

Said Ramadan

Johnson shows how, without anyone quite planning it, the Americans usurped von Mende’s network and handed it over to Said Ramadan. This early U.S. boost to the Muslim Brotherhood, Johnson argues, gave it the means to establish an Islamist framework just in time to welcome the surge of Muslim immigration to Europe in the 1970s.

Thus did the Islamist domination of European Muslims have two hidden facilitators, Nazi and American. Its origins in Operation Barbarossa reveals the ugly pedigree of today’s Islamist strength. Hitler and his thugs could not have foreseen it, but they helped set the stage for Eurabia.

Oppdemmingspolitikk var stikkordet for bekjempelse av kommunisme under den kalde krigen, og muslimene sto frem som potensielle allierte. Den gang hadde man ingen motforestillinger.

Deploying an Islamist may have seemed like a original and clever idea but it was neither. Western governments have been allying without success with Islamists for decades. Indeed, they have been allying with Ramadan’s own family.

In 1953, Dwight D. Eisenhower hosted a group of foreign Muslims that included Said Ramadan (1926-95), a leader of arguably the most influential Islamist organization of the twentieth century, the rabidly anti-West Muslim Brotherhood – and also Tariq’s father. The Eisenhower-Ramadan meeting took place in the context of sustained U.S. government efforts to rally Muslims against Soviet communism, in part by putting Said Ramadan on the CIA payroll. Talcott Seelye, an American diplomat who met with him about that time explains: «We thought of Islam as a counterweight to communism.»

Then there was Hasan al-Banna (1906-49), Tariq’s grandfather, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, and recipient of Nazi funding, American diplomats in Cairo in the late 1940s had «regular meetings» with al-Banna, found him «perfectly empathetic,» and perceived his organization to be a «moderate» and even a «positive» force. The British apparently offered al-Banna money.
In other words, Western governments have a history of ignoring the Islamists’ repulsive ideology and working with them, even strengthening them.

Man har vært villig til å overse de ubehagelige sidene ved islamistene. Enda mer betenkelig blir dette når de er etablert i Vesten. Etter 7/7-bombene i London så Tony Blair seg om etter moderate muslimer som kunne bistå i bekjempelsen av de radikale. Han henvendte seg bla. til Tariq Ramadan.

Vestlige myndigheter har innledet samarbeid med ikke-voldelige islamister, og kaller dem moderate. Det er en farlig illusjon, skriver Pipes.

rather than turn to anti-Islamist Muslims who reject the triumphalist goal of applying Islamic law in Europe, they promoted non-violent Islamists, hoping these would persuade coreligionists to express their hatred of the West in lawful ways.

Det er ironisk ment. Vestlige myndigheter er fornøyd så lenge hatet mot Vesten uttrykkes verbalt, ikke fysisk. Det er bare snakk om en utsettelse. Arbeidet for sharia og islamisering skjer innenfra.

How Islamists Came to Dominate European Islam

by Daniel Pipes
National Review Online
May 25, 2010

— Daniel Pipes is director of the Middle East Forum and Taube Distinguished Fellow at the Hoover Institution of Stanford University.