50 amerikanske etterretningsanalytikere har protestert mot at rapportene de skriver om kampanjen mot IS blir retusjert på høyere nivå slik at de stemmer overens med oppfatningen om at USA vinner.DailyBeast

Analytikerne er langt fra like optimistiske. Men det må de være hvis de skal beholde jobben.

Two senior analysts at CENTCOM signed a written complaint sent to the Defense Department inspector general in July alleging that the reports, some of which were briefed to President Obama, portrayed the terror groups as weaker than the analysts believe they are. The reports were changed by CENTCOM higher-ups to adhere to the administration’s public line that the U.S. is winning the battle against ISIS and al Nusra, al Qaeda’s branch in Syria, the analysts claim.

That complaint was supported by 50 other analysts, some of whom have complained about politicizing of intelligence reports for months. That’s according to 11 individuals who are knowledgeable about the details of the report and who spoke to The Daily Beast on condition of anonymity.

The accusations suggest that a large number of people tracking the inner workings of the terror groups think that their reports are being manipulated to fit a public narrative.


Some of those CENTCOM analysts described the sizeable cadre of protesting analysts as a “revolt” by intelligence professionals who are paid to give their honest assessment, based on facts, and not to be influenced by national-level policy. The analysts have accused senior-level leaders, including the director of intelligence and his deputy in CENTCOM, of changing their analyses to be more in line with the Obama administration’s public contention that the fight against ISIS and al Qaeda is making progress. The analysts take a more pessimistic view about how military efforts to destroy the groups are going.

Det er ganske alvorlig hvis Obamas politiske korrekthet og uvilje mot å involvere seg i Midtøsten får slike konsekvenser.


Liker du det du leser? Vipps noen kroner til Document på 13629