BBC`s klima-ekspert, Paul Hudson, avslører at han fikk tilsendt flere av de lekkede e-postene fra opphavspersonene i CRU (Climate Research Unit) ved universitetet i East Anglia for en måned siden, og at de er et direkte resultat av en av hans artikler.

Hudson skriver på sin BBC-blogg at han mottok flere av de aktuelle e-postene 12. oktober, og at avsenderne er opphavspersonene selv. E-postene er skrevet av ledende klimaforskere som reagerte på Hudsons artikkel «Hva skjedde med den globale oppvarmingen?» fra 9. oktober. I denne artikkelen argumenterte Hudson for at det ikke har vært noen globale temperaturøkninger de siste 11 årene. Hudson presenterte også argumenter fra såkalte klimaskeptikere som mener at den naturlige syklusen kontrollerer temperaturen, samt motargumenter fra de som mener at det er menneskenes handlinger som skaper oppvarming.

The controversy surrounding the global warming e-mail scandal has deepened after a BBC correspondent admitted he was sent the leaked messages more than a month before they were made public.

Paul Hudson, weather presenter and climate change expert, claims the documents allegedly sent between some of the world’s leading scientists are of a direct result of an article he wrote.

In his BBC blog three days ago, Hudson said: ‘I was forwarded the chain of emails on the 12th October, which are comments from some of the world’s leading climate scientists written as a direct result of my article «Whatever Happened To Global Warming».’

That essay, written last month, argued that for the last 11 years there had not been an increase in global temperatures.

It also presented the arguments of sceptics who believe natural cycles control temperature and the counter-arguments of those who think it’s man’s actions which are warming the planet.

The leaked files – which show 4,000 documents which have allegedly been sent by scientists over the past 13 years – were apparently taken from servers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit, which is a world-renowned centre focused on studying climate change.

They were then uploaded on to a Russian server before being published on a blog called Air Vent.

The e-mails apparently show researchers discussing how to ‘spin’ climate data and how that information should be presented to the media.

I tillegg skriver Hudson at de offentliggjorte – fra en russisk server – e-postene er identiske med de han personlig mottok fra opphavsmennene i oktober, og at han derfor mener at denne delen av Climategate-materialet er autentisk. Imidlertid forklarer han ikke hvorfor han har sittet på det kontroversielle materialet så lenge, men legger til at han snart vil skrive om saken og mulige implikasjoner i saken.

Tidligere chancellor Lord Lawson krever nå en granskning av saken, og advarer om den britiske vitenskapens troverdighet står på spill. Samtidig øker presset på klimatologen og professoren Phil Jones – som i en av e-postene angivelig kaller en klimaskeptikers dødsfall for «oppløftende nyheter» – til å forlate sin stilling som leder for CRU.

In other messages, researchers appear to be discussing manipulating data and how to dodge Freedom Of Information requests.

Another shows a climatologist from the U.S. admitting it was a travesty that the lack of global warming in recent years could not be explained.

George Monbiot, a leading environmentalist, said he was convinced the emails were genuine, adding: ‘I’m dismayed and deeply shaken.

‘There are some messages that require no spin to make them look bad.

‘The head of the unit, Phil Jones, should now resign. Some of the data discussed in the emails should be re-analysed.’

However, Professor Jones yesteday told the Telegraph he stands by his findings.

He called any conspiracy to manipulate climate data to support the theory of man-made global warming ‘complete rubbish’.

‘The facts speak for themselves, there is no need for anyone to manipulate them,’ he added.

When posted on the internet, the emails were accompanied by the anonymous statement: ‘We feel that climate science is, in the current situation, too important to be kept under wraps.

‘We hereby release a random selection of correspondence, code and documents.

‘Hopefully it will give some insight into the science and the people behind it.’

A spokesman for the University of East Anglia said: ‘We are aware that information from a server used for research information in one area of the university has been made available on public websites.

‘Because of the volume of this information we cannot currently confirm that all this material is genuine.

‘We are undertaking a thorough internal investigation and have involved the police in this inquiry.’

Paul Hudson was unavailable for comment.

CRU er ett av de fire forskningssenterne FNs klimapanel bygger sine rapporter på.

Daily Mail: Climate change scandal deepens as BBC expert claims he was sent leaked emails

Les også Jan Arild Snoens gjennomgang av saken på Minerva.

Vi i Document ønsker å legge til rette for en interessant og høvisk debatt om sakene som vi skriver om. Vennligst les våre retningslinjer for debattskikk før du deltar 🙂