Amerikanske styrker kan ikke bli værende i Irak for å avverge folkemord. Da skulle USA ha intervenert i både Darfur og Kongo, sier Barack Obama. Han erkjenner at volden vil øke hvis amerikanerne trekker seg ut.
Men amerikanernes nærvær fungerer som en magnet på internasjonal terrorisme og irakiske fraksjoner bruker dem som påskudd til ikke å finne løsninger, sier Obama til Ap.
Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama said Thursday the United States cannot use its military to solve humanitarian problems and that preventing a potential genocide in Iraq isn’t a good enough reason to keep U.S. forces there.
«Well, look, if that’s the criteria by which we are making decisions on the deployment of U.S. forces, then by that argument you would have 300,000 troops in the Congo right now — where millions have been slaughtered as a consequence of ethnic strife — which we haven’t done,» Obama said in an interview with The Associated Press.
«We would be deploying unilaterally and occupying the Sudan, which we haven’t done. Those of us who care about Darfur don’t think it would be a good idea,» he said.
Obama, a first-term senator from Illinois, said it’s likely there would be increased bloodshed if U.S. forces left Iraq.
«Nobody is proposing we leave precipitously. There are still going to be U.S. forces in the region that could intercede, with an international force, on an emergency basis,» Obama said between stops on the first of two days scheduled on the New Hampshire campaign trail. «There’s no doubt there are risks of increased bloodshed in Iraq without a continuing U.S. presence there.»
The greater risk is staying in Iraq, Obama said.
«It is my assessment that those risks are even greater if we continue to occupy Iraq and serve as a magnet for not only terrorist activity but also irresponsible behavior by Iraqi factions,» he said.
The senator has been a fierce critic of the war in Iraq, speaking out against it even before he was elected to his post in 2004. He was among the senators who tried unsuccessfully earlier this week to force President Bush’s hand and begin to limit the role of U.S. forces there.
«We have not lost a military battle in Iraq. So when people say if we leave, we will lose, they’re asking the wrong question,» he said. «We cannot achieve a stable Iraq with a military. We could be fighting there for the next decade.»
Obama said the answer to Iraq — and other civil conflicts — lies in diplomacy.
«When you have civil conflict like this, military efforts and protective forces can play an important role, especially if they’re under an international mandate as opposed to simply a U.S. mandate. But you can’t solve the underlying problem at the end of a barrel of a gun,» he said. «There’s got to be a deliberate and constant diplomatic effort to get the various factions to recognize that they are better off arriving at a peaceful resolution of their conflicts.»
The Republican National Committee