En av Egypts mest kjentere bloggere er arrestert – igjen. Hans skjebne er nettopp det dagens politikk handler om. Egypt trenger ikke at Mubarak-dynastiet fortsetter. Det kjører landet i grøfta. Det trenger heller ikke at Det muslimske brorskap overtar. Det gir heller ikke human development. Det trenger dissidenter som Abdelkareem Nabil Suleiman, kjent som Kareem Amer.
Det er en svært ujevn kamp. En viktig forutsetning for at den kan lykkes er at Vesten begynner å interessere seg for den demokratiske opposisjonen i Midtøsten. Da vil vi oppdage at disse menneskene er våre allierte, og at vi er helt avhengige av at de lykkes.
A Reporters Without Borders report released in early November 2006 showed Egypt to be among the 13 countries with the gravest violations of freedom of expression on the Internet. Shortly after the report’s release, on November 6, Egyptian blogger Abdelkareem Nabil Suleiman, known by his web pseudonym Kareem Amer, was arrested.(1)
Abdelkareem Nabil Suleiman had attended Al-Azhar for elementary and secondary school, in accordance with his parents’ wishes. He wanted to pursue university studies in biology, but family pressure forced him to abandon these studies after two years and to enroll in the Department of Shari’a and Legal Studies at Al-Azhar. In 2004, he began to write for the reformist website www.rezgar.com. He also published articles on the Coptic website http://copts-united.com, as well as on his own blog, http://karam903.blogspot.com.
In October 2005, Suleiman was arrested after he published an article on Copt-Muslim confrontations in Alexandria, and was released 18 days later.(2) In March 2006, he was summoned to appear before an Al-Azhar disciplinary committee because of his Internet writings criticizing the role of religion in Egypt. The committee decided to expel him from the university. About his expulsion, Suleiman wrote: «Thus ended a black period in my life, which I spent between the walls of the big prison known as ‘The Al-Azhar Institution.'»(3) In the last blog entry before his arrest, Suleiman harshly criticized Al-Azhar, and predicted that he would be arrested for doing so.(4)
A petition calling for his release has been posted online by the HAMSA organization («Hands Across the Mideast Support Alliance»), an American Muslim association for promoting civil rights in the Middle East. It is a branch of the American Islamic Congress, a group established post-9/11 to promote interfaith and interethnic understanding.(5)
Following are excerpts from Abdelkareem Suleiman’s last article before his arrest:
Al-Azhar’s Teachings «Contradict Reason and Incite to Violence Against People of Other Beliefs»
«I started studying at Al-Azhar in accordance with my parents’ wishes. Despite my later absolute opposition to Al-Azhar and religious thought, and despite my fiercely critical writing on religion’s infiltration into public life, and religion’s control over people’s behavior and their relations with others… freeing myself from the bonds of being a former Al-Azhar University student was not… an easy thing.
«When I received my liberty, in the form of my final expulsion papers from the university in March, 2006, I thought that this would be the end of the matter, and that the fact that I had received these papers was, for me, a certificate of liberty from my Al-Azhar captivity and from Al-Azhar University, which arbitrarily controls first the lives of its students, and, to varying degrees, also the public and life in this country …
«However, it seems that Al-Azhar’s ‘blessings’ to its students cannot easily be wiped out, and they continue to pursue the student like a shadow. A student who finished high school at Al-Azhar cannot apply to any state university. I attempted to do this several times this year and in previous years, before they expelled me, but none of my attempts met with any success. It is enough that you hold this infamous diploma [from Al-Azhar] for you to be unable to study like other citizens in the country, who differ from you in that they hold state high school diplomas.
«It seems that Al-Azhar’s ‘blessings’ to its students are not limited to preventing them from completing their studies far from Al-Azhar. What happened to me, and what is going to happen to me in the coming days, clearly proves that Al-Azhar’s ‘blessings’ will not leave in peace a student who tries to rise up against the university and oppose things he is forced to learn there – things that contradict reason and incite to violence against people of other beliefs – until he stands at the edge of his grave… or until he enters the prison gates. And it seems that this is what I am about to deal with in the coming days…»
«I Decry Any Law, Legislation, or Regime That Does Not Respect Human Rights and Liberty»
«A few hours ago, a summons from the general prosecutor arrived at my house, demanding that I show up for questioning next Monday…
«It seems that Al-Azhar’s ‘blessings’, which I vainly imagined I had escaped when I received my certificate of liberty, continue to pursue me to this day, and my summons for questioning by the prosecutor is one of their manifestations. These ‘blessings’ do not leave their bearer in peace, until he is in a situation like that of Dr. Nasser Hamed Abu Zayd, for whom Al-Azhar’s ‘blessings’ led to [a court] ruling that he must be separated from his wife; or a situation like that of Dr. Ahmed Sobhi Mansour, for whom Al-Azhar’s ‘blessings’ led to his imprisonment and forced emigration from the country, once and for all; or, in the best of cases, a situation like those that of Dr. Nawal Al-Sa’dawi, Ahmed Al-Shahawi, and others, for whose writings Al-Azhar always advises boycotts and prevention of market distribution.
«I am not at all afraid. Luckily for me, the enemies of free thought, who treat me in ways that only the intellectually bankrupt employ, make me more sure of myself, more steadfast in my principles, and ready to deal with anything in order to express my free opinion, without any limitation whatsoever imposed on me by governments, religious institutions, or even the totalitarian society…
«The very existence of laws that define freedom of thought as a crime, and that punish with imprisonment anyone who expresses criticism of the religion [i.e. Islam] in any way, is a dangerous flaw in the law – [the law] which exists to regulate relations among people in society, not to suppress their liberty for the benefit of religion, the law itself, or the social order…
«I declare here, frankly and clearly, that I decry any law, legislation, or regime that does not respect human rights and individual liberty, does not recognize an individual’s complete freedom to do anything and everything so long as he causes no physical harm those around him, and does not recognize an individual’s complete freedom to express his opinions, whatever they may be, so long as those opinions re2_kommentar words and entail no physical act that harms others.»