Wilders - mistet 43 prosent av velgerne

Hans Rustad

Geert Wil­ders Fri­hets­parti ble straf­fet av vel­gerne for at det vel­tet koa­li­sjo­nen mel­lom Det libe­rale parti og kris­te­lig­de­mo­kra­tene. Sosia­list­par­ti­ets Nederland-først-linje ga hel­ler ikke uttelling.

Det er verdt å notere hva vel­gerne straf­fet. Fri­hets­par­tiet mis­tet 43 pro­sent av vel­gerne fra for­rige valg. Det er mange.

Just a month ago, the for­mer Mao­ist Socia­lists of Emile Roe­mer, who oppose aus­terity and bailouts for weaker euro zone countries, were eit­her lead­ing in opi­nion polls or neck and neck with Prime Minis­ter Mark Rutte’s Liberals.

Wil­ders’ Free­dom Party was snap­ping at their heels, having switched the­mes from his sig­na­ture anti-Islamic immi­gra­tion bashing to cal­ling for the Net­her­lands to scrap the euro, bring back the guil­der and leave the Euro­pean Union.

The bleached-blonde Wil­ders suf­fe­red the big­gest deba­cle, los­ing more than a third of his seats to tie for a dis­tant third place with the Socia­lists, who held on to their 15 lawmakers.

Wil­ders’ sup­por­ters eit­her voted tac­ti­cally, mostly for Rutte’s Libe­rals, or deserted him in dis­may at his ill-conceived stra­tegy of brin­ging down a centre-right govern­ment and figh­ting the election on eco­no­mics rat­her than immigration.

As the third-largest party in par­lia­ment since 2010, the Free­dom Party had real influ­ence on policy by kee­ping a minority Liberal-Christian Democrat coalition in office. Many sup­por­ters were upset when Wil­ders topp­led the govern­ment in April by refu­sing to back bud­get cuts.

DICTATORIAL SOUND-BITE KING

Seve­ral Free­dom Party law­ma­kers quit in the run-up to the election, brin­ging inter­nal con­flicts and com­pla­ints about Wil­ders’ alleged dicta­to­rial style into the open.

Results from strong­holds such as Wil­ders’ home town of Venlo showed that voters had switched to Rutte’s Liberals.

A sur­vey by pol­ling agency Ipsos Syno­vate found that 43 per­cent of for­mer Free­dom Party voters chose a dif­fe­rent party because they felt it made no sense to vote for a group which others had ruled out as a coalition partner.

More than a quar­ter of voters said they voted tac­ti­cally and 12 per­cent only made up their minds on election day.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/13/us-dutch-election-radicals-idUSBRE88C13220120913


Om du ikke følger Document på sosiale media kan du følge oss på e-post.

Donere engangsbeløp?Kan du forplikte deg til fast betaling?

Penger kan også doneres til kontonummer 15030249981.

Leserkommentarer på Document er gjenstand for moderering, som ikke skjer kontinuerlig og under enhver omstendighet ikke om natten. Vi ønsker en respektfull tone uten personangrep, sleivete språk eller flammende retorikk. Vis særlig nøkternhet når temaet er følsomt. Begrenset redigering av skjemmende detaljer kan finne sted. Skriv til debatt@document.no dersom du ikke forstår hvorfor en kommentar uteblir. Se her for nybegynnerhjelp.