Skam uten like

Nadira Naipaul

Enken etter Nobel­pris­vin­ner i lit­te­ra­tur, V.S. Nai­paul, Nadira, beskri­ver hvor­dan de mør­keste tra­di­sjo­ner i hen­nes hjem­land Pakis­tan, har fulgt med og slått rot i Storbritannia.

 

Hun trodde hun ville være fri i Stor­bri­tan­nia, men må kon­sta­tere at samme under­tryk­kende, men­neske­fiendt­lige prak­si­ser utfol­der seg i Europa.

Dette fak­tum, at sam­fun­net til­la­ter en slik kvinne­mis­hand­ling, vil få konsekvenser.

Campaigner: Nadira Naipaul, pictured, has witnessed first-hand the torture inflicted on women in Pakistan

Cam­paig­ner: Nadira Nai­paul, pic­tu­red, has wit­nessed first-hand the tor­ture inflicted on women in Pakistan
When I mar­ried V.  S. Nai­paul and moved to Eng­land in 1996, I thought I had left the hor­ror behind.
Pakis­tan had drai­ned my resolve, and I was tired of figh­ting a los­ing battle. To me, Eng­land, for all its ills, was the pro­mi­sed land.
Instead, I have found the hor­ror I fled has followed me here. It is all around, ero­ding the very core of eve­rything Bri­tain belie­ves in.
I see it eve­rywhere. In the haunted eyes of young Pakis­tani girls, brought up in Bri­tain, who know not­hing but a Western­ised life: young women who work happ­ily behind beauty coun­ters in our depart­ment sto­res, yet must return home to parents who refuse to emerge from their cul­tural ghet­tos.
And who expect their daugh­ters to accept tra­ditio­nal arran­ged mar­ria­ges to dis­tant cou­sins brought up in rural Pakistan.
Despe­rate to inte­grate, these young girls change their names to sound more Bri­tish. They are happy to have white boy­fri­ends, to go club­bing. They cer­tainly do not want for­ced marriages.
When I talk to them they are seet­hing with anger that their parents – some semi-literate – insist upon entren­ching them­sel­ves in Mus­lim ghet­tos, erec­ting cul­tural bar­riers and refu­sing to inte­grate, rejec­ting any sem­blance of a Bri­tish way of life. 
I see the same anger in young Mus­lim men who despe­ra­tely want to join the main­stream, but can­not because deeply tra­ditio­nal parents expect strict adhe­rence to tra­ditio­nal Isla­mic family life. It is easy to see how the clash between the gene­ra­tions can become cor­ro­sive, how at its most destruc­tive extreme it can cul­mi­nate in ‘honour killings’.
Take the recent case in War­ring­ton  of Iftikhar and Farzana Ahmed, who mur­de­red their Western­ised daugh­ter Sha­filea, 17, because she refu­sed to accept a for­ced marriage.
Honour killing: Iftikhar Ahmed, 52, and his wife Farzana, 49, of Warrington, Cheshire, suffocated their 17-year-old daughter Shafilea with a plastic bag because she refused an arranged marriage

Honour kil­ling: Iftikhar Ahmed, 52, and his wife Farzana, 49, of War­ring­ton, Ches­hire, suffo­cated their 17-year-old daugh­ter Sha­filea with a plas­tic bag because she refu­sed an arran­ged marriage
Inside the courtroom: Iftikhar Ahmed stood impassively as the verdicts were given while his spouse wiped tears from her eyes with a tissue

Inside the cour­troom: Iftikhar Ahmed stood impas­sively as the ver­dicts were given while his spouse wiped tears from her eyes with a tissue
At a previous hearing: Iftikhar and Farzana Ahmed were<br /><br />
 two traditionalist disciplinarians who had very fixed ideas about how their children, particularly their daughters, should behave

At a pre­vious hea­ring: Iftikhar and Farzana Ahmed were two tra­ditio­na­list disci­pli­na­ri­ans who had very fixed ideas about how their child­ren, par­ti­cu­larly their daugh­ters, should behave
For a decade, while in Pakis­tan, I wrote exten­sively about women enmeshed in the rest­ric­tions of Isla­mic law and tra­ditions of honour. Wit­nessing the tor­ture inflicted on women by hus­bands, fat­hers, brot­hers and even female rela­ti­ves with the seeming sanc­tion of Islam gra­dually trans­for­med me into a bor­der­line here­tic. It took me years to rea­lise how deeply ingrai­ned these beliefs are. And how dif­fi­cult it is to com­bat them.
The tales of two women affected me deeply. While living on my farm in rural Baha­walpur with my first hus­band, I met Rani, a young woman whose hus­band was one of my sea­so­nal labourers. I emp­loyed her as a maid.
A few mon­ths later, we were visited by a minis­ter in the govern­ment who was one of the big­gest lan­dow­ners in the area and an old fri­end of my hus­band. He arrived with an entourage deman­ding that I hand over Rani, her hus­band and her five-year-old son.
Missing: Shafilea Ahmed disappeared in September 2003 and her body was found on the bank of the River Kent in Cumbria the following February

Mis­sing: Sha­filea Ahmed dis­appea­red in Sep­tem­ber 2003 and her body was found on the bank of the River Kent in Cum­bria the following February
Rani had been a beaut­i­ful child. At the age of ten, her parents, ten­ants of the minister’s grand­fat­her, ‘gave’ her to the old man. She was regu­larly sexually abu­sed by the minis­ter, his fat­her and grand­fat­her. The women of the house did not pro­test, pro­vi­ded the men were discreet.
But when Rani became preg­nant they mar­ried her off to an old man who often beat her and her son.
A few years later Rani fell in love with a local boy and elo­ped with him and the child. Now the minis­ter wan­ted her back. 
What, I asked my hus­band, would hap­pen if we han­ded her over? He told me they would strip her, tie her to a car­riage wheel, flog her, then rape her. She would be defi­led in public.
He insis­ted, how­e­ver, that we must hand her over. Not to do so would offend an old family fri­end. If not chas­ti­sed properly, it would encourage other women to ques­tion their lot.
My hus­band had been edu­cated in Eng­land and was the scion of an old, respec­ted family, yet he accep­ted such things. When he rea­lised I wouldn’t give Rani up, the minis­ter said his ‘face must be saved’. He insis­ted upon taking the boy. Rani wai­led like a bans­hee. The hear­tren­ding sight and sound of her has never left me.
On anot­her occa­sion, a young woman was dou­sed in petrol and set alight by her fat­her and brot­her in front of her ter­ri­fied mot­her and sis­ters because she would not marry a man who had abducted her. The family con­side­red her defi­led. She had stayed over­night with this man. She must marry him or they would be sha­med. When she tried to run away, they mur­de­red her.
These are extreme examp­les, but stark remin­ders of the hold these beliefs have on entren­ched com­mu­nities – com­mu­nities that have, for five deca­des, been relo­ca­ting to Britain. 
So why, then, have succes­sive Govern­ments refu­sed to ack­now­ledge the incestuous cul­tu­res that have evolved in these ghet­tos? Why does no one chal­lenge the exist­ence of the so-called ‘Isla­mic Par­lia­ments’, with their retro­gres­sive laws, that exist in cities such as Brad­ford and Leicester? 
Time for change: Nadira Naipaul believes Muslim women, pictured here outside Bangor Street Community Centre in Blackburn, England, should not be forced to wear veils

Time for change: Nadira Nai­paul belie­ves Mus­lim women, pic­tu­red here out­side Bangor Street Com­mu­nity Centre in Black­burn, Eng­land, should not be for­ced to wear veils
In these cities, teams of vigi­lan­tes ter­ro­rise Pakis­tani com­mu­nities. They turn up unannoun­ced to homes, insis­ting that Rama­dan is respec­ted and check­ing that eve­ryone has come to pray­ers. They force shops to close, they check that the com­mu­nity is fas­ting, that women wear the veil. 
Let me be clear. No Mus­lim woman should be for­ced to wear a veil. No woman wore it in the era of the Prop­het. These Mus­lims may see them­sel­ves as com­mu­nity champions, but they are fana­tics who make life a misery for young people who want to integrate.
It is time for libe­ral Mus­lims to speak out.The defen­ders of our precious mul­ti­cul­tura­lism must get real. My mes­sage to those who pro­mote these entren­ched ghetto ideas is this: go home if you want to prac­tise your form of Islam. There is no place for it here.


Om du ikke følger Document på sosiale media kan du følge oss på e-post.

Donere engangsbeløp?Kan du forplikte deg til fast betaling?

Penger kan også doneres til kontonummer 15030249981.

Leserkommentarer på Document er gjenstand for moderering, som ikke skjer kontinuerlig og under enhver omstendighet ikke om natten. Vi ønsker en respektfull tone uten personangrep, sleivete språk eller flammende retorikk. Vis særlig nøkternhet når temaet er følsomt. Begrenset redigering av skjemmende detaljer kan finne sted. Skriv til debatt@document.no dersom du ikke forstår hvorfor en kommentar uteblir. Se her for nybegynnerhjelp.