Bygger Iran et tredje anrikingsanlegg

Hans Rustad

En ame­ri­kansk tenke­tank mener Iran er i ferd med å bygge et tredje anri­kings­an­legg for uran, For­dow, ved Quom. Hva skal Iran med et slikt, når det alle­rede pro­du­se­rer langt mer anri­ket uran enn det tren­ger til sine sivile formål?

An Ame­ri­can think tank ques­tio­ned whether Iran is secretly con­struc­ting a third nuclear enrich­ment faci­lity and posited that its For­dow site is likely used for pro­du­cing weapons-grade ura­nium in two reports released on Monday.

Iran’s For­dow nuclear faci­lity, a clande­stine under­ground site near the city of Qom, is “unne­ces­sary for its civi­lian nuclear pro­gram” and unne­e­ded unless Iran wants nuclear weapons, accor­ding to the Insti­tute for Science and Inter­na­tio­nal Security (ISIS).

Iran’s deci­sion to build a rela­tively small, deeply buried enrich­ment faci­lity wit­hout first infor­ming the IAEA sug­gests that For­dow was inten­ded to be used to make weapon-grade ura­nium (enriched to over 90 per­cent) for nuclear weapons, or to pro­vide Iran with that option,” the For­dow report said, citing Inter­na­tio­nal Atomic Energy Associa­tion (IAEA) evidence.

Since the plant was dis­covered in 2009, Iran has changed its stated pur­pose mul­tiple times in offi­cial IAEA docu­ments and cor­re­spon­dence, adding “cre­dence to the assess­ment that after rea­li­zing it was caught in 2009 buil­ding the faci­lity in secret, Iran rushed to proclaim a civi­lian pur­pose for it with the IAEA.”

The fact that Iran has changed the stated pur­pose of the faci­lity so many times over such a short period “rai­ses sig­ni­fi­cant ques­tions regar­ding its ori­gi­nal pur­pose,” as does an 2009 IAEA report that Iran had sig­ni­fi­cantly remode­led sec­tions of the site following the reve­la­tion of its existence.

The report ques­tions the need for the For­dow site, noting that the Natanz faci­lity alre­ady pro­du­ces enough 3.5% low-enriched ura­nium for Iran’s power plants, and sta­ting that Iran alre­ady has enough 19.75% ura­nium to run the Teh­ran Rese­arch Reac­tor for five to 20 years.

New reports raise alarm about Iran’s nuclear pro­gram
Think tank’s rese­arch sug­gests pos­sible third nuclear enrich­ment site, ques­tions civi­lian use for the For­dow nuclear facility


Om du ikke følger Document på sosiale media kan du følge oss på e-post.

Donere engangsbeløp?Kan du forplikte deg til fast betaling?

Penger kan også doneres til kontonummer 15030249981.

Leserkommentarer på Document er gjenstand for moderering, som ikke skjer kontinuerlig og under enhver omstendighet ikke om natten. Vi ønsker en respektfull tone uten personangrep, sleivete språk eller flammende retorikk. Vis særlig nøkternhet når temaet er følsomt. Begrenset redigering av skjemmende detaljer kan finne sted. Skriv til debatt@document.no dersom du ikke forstår hvorfor en kommentar uteblir. Se her for nybegynnerhjelp.