Kuwait - dødsstraff for blasfemi?

Anna Mahjar-Barducci

Sosiale medier er ikke under myn­dig­he­te­nes kon­troll og det er neppe til­fel­dig at det er på disse man påstår det ytres ting som er blasfemiske.

En stak­kars mann sit­ter i feng­sel for noe som ble sagt på twit­ter om Pro­fe­ten og hans koner. Han hev­der det er kon­toen hans som ble misbrukt.

En kuwai­tisk for­fat­ter ble i april dømt til syv års feng­sel for å ha sagt noe om shiaer som ble opp­fat­tet som ulov­lig. Man får inn­trykk av at det er tema og ord som “sek­te­risk” som ram­mes, ikke ned­set­tende ordbruk.

Man ser der­for tegn til et back­lash: sosiale medier får kre­ditt for å ha bidratt til den ara­biske våren. Nå for­sø­ker myn­dig­he­tene å under­legge dem kontroll.

Kuwait Con­si­de­ring Death Penalty for Blasphemy

by Anna Mahjar-Barducci

Kuwait’s par­lia­ment has pro­vi­sio­nally voted in favor of a legal amend­ment that could make insul­ting God and the Prop­het Moham­med punis­hable by death,” reported the Ara­bic Network for Human Rights Infor­ma­tion (ANHRI). Anot­her human rights orga­niza­tion, IFEX, stated that the amend­ment, approved on 12 April, was backed by 46 Mem­bers of the Kuwaiti Par­lia­ment, with four oppo­sed and others abs­tai­ning. The bill needs a second vote and the approval from Kuwait’s ruler, Sheikh Sabah Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah, before becoming law.

IFEX explai­ned that the MPs pro­po­sed the death penalty for reli­gious cri­mes after aut­hori­ties last month arrested a Shi­ite man, Hamad al-Naqi, for allegedly using the social network Twit­ter to curse the Prop­het Moham­med, his wife and some com­pa­nions. Al-Naqi denies the char­ges and said that his Twit­ter account was hacked. He is pre­sently in pre-trial deten­tion. Reu­ters recently reported that Al-Naqi, while in jail, was attacked by a fel­low inmate and sustai­ned minor injuries.

Seve­ral Kuwaiti MPs threate­ned that if Al-Naqi would not be punis­hed -- for an alleged crime for which he has not yet been con­victed -- Kuwai­tis will start mass pro­tests. MP Jamaan Al-Harbash said that the Kuwaiti nation should punish Al-Naqi if the govern­ment fails to do so. “We are wai­ting for the arrest of the rene­gade so that cala­mity can be avoi­ded,” the MP com­men­ted. Anot­her Kuwiati, MP Waleed Al-Tabatabae, said: “If the ‘bar­king dog’ is not arrested and legal measu­res are not taken against him, we will call gat­her at the Irada Square today.”

ANHRI noted that many Kuwai­tis are facing trial for blasphemy and, if the law is passed, might exe­cuted. One is Moham­med Al-Mulaifi, a Kuwaiti wri­ter, sent­en­ced in April to seven years in jail with hard labor, and a fine of US$18,000 for pub­lish­ing on Twit­ter insults against Shi’ism. Accor­ding to news reports, Al-Mulaifi is guilty of say­ing that Kuwait “suf­fers from secta­rian strugg­les and con­flicts.” Al-Mulaifi also accu­sed Shi’ites in Kuwait of being dis­loyal to Kuwait but loyal to Iran, based on their reli­gious belief, and slande­red the Shi’ite Imam, Al-Mahdi. Accor­ding to Reu­ters, the court com­men­ted that Al-Mulaifi pos­ted “false­hoods about secta­rian divi­sions in the Gulf Arab coun­try and insulted the Shi’ite faith and its scholars with com­ments that damaged Kuwait’s image.”

A Kuwaiti obser­ver com­men­ted to the Kuwaiti Times that “Al-Mulaifi’s crime, if it was a crime, can­not be meted out with the harsh punish­ment of seven years. […] Seven years in jail over­kills. It is not fair.” The Kuwaiti Times, how­e­ver, reports that a num­ber of poli­ti­ci­ans expressed satis­faction with the ver­dict issued against the Kuwaiti wri­ter. “Kuwait’s judi­ciary sys­tem is very honest and is con­side­red a ‘safety valve’ safe­guar­ding the whole society,” they stressed.

The exis­ting laws on blasphemy in Kuwait are part of Article 111 of the Penal Code, which pro­hi­bits defa­ma­tion of reli­gion. Article 111 cur­rently requi­res up to one year’s impri­son­ment and a fine for dis­se­mi­na­ting opi­nions belitt­ling reli­gion. In Kuwait, blasphemy has been ille­gal since 1961.

As many “attacks against reli­gion” are allegedly coming from Twit­ter, the Gulf Times reported that Kuwait is plan­ning to pass laws to regu­late the use of social networ­king sites. “The govern­ment is now in the process of estab­lish­ing laws that will allow govern­ment entities to regu­late the use of the dif­fe­rent new media out­lets such as Twit­ter in order to safe­guard the cohe­sive­ness of the popu­la­tion and society,” Infor­ma­tion Minis­ter Sheikh Moha­med Al-Mubarak Al-Sabah said.

In addition, the Infor­ma­tion Minis­ter urged the Par­lia­ment to pass a law to regu­late social media as soon as pos­sible. “I have been asking the par­lia­men­ta­ri­ans to give this priority,” he said.

Isla­mist MP Moha­med Al-Dallal agrees with the Infor­ma­tion Minis­ter: “Twit­ter is an open area … eve­ryone can speak. But it is not always being used as social media in Kuwait -- not about fri­endship or per­so­nal mat­ters but it is being used poli­ti­cally, to attack. This is a bad thing.”

The Kuwait Par­lia­ment seems to be seriously inten­ding to bring Kuwait back to the Middle Ages. As well as intro­du­cing the death penalty for blasphemy, the Kuwaiti MPs have sug­ge­sted ban­ning swim­suits and requi­ring women to wear heads­car­ves in pub­lic. The jour­na­list Sahar Moussa recently pub­lis­hed an article in the Kuwaiti Times, entit­led “Kuwait Devel­op­ment = Bikini Ban,” argu­ing that the Kuwaiti Par­lia­ment appa­rently thinks that brin­ging devel­op­ment to Kuwait does not come from crea­ting job opport­u­nities, but rat­her from ban­ning swim­suits. “My point here is that you do not have to hide behind reli­gion and dis­tract people with holy reli­gious edicts and ignore what your coun­try needs. Sorry to say it, but some MPs are dis­trac­ting people with their irre­le­vant ideas […] Is their mis­sion to kill the dreams of the young people and push them to find com­fort and edu­ca­tion in other countries? Well, mis­sion accom­plis­hed! […] I would like to give notice […] that under inter­na­tio­nal law, ‘reli­gious’ offen­ces do not fall under the cate­gory of ‘most serious cri­mes,’ the mini­mum thre­s­hold pres­cri­bed for cri­mes car­ry­ing the death penalty. And MPs, every time you think of swim­suits […] try plan­ting a tree or start put­ting one brick on top of anot­her to build a factory for Kuwait’s sake and its future.”

Kuwait Con­si­de­ring Death Penalty for Blasphemy


Om du ikke følger Document på sosiale media kan du følge oss på e-post.

Donere engangsbeløp?Kan du forplikte deg til fast betaling?

Penger kan også doneres til kontonummer 15030249981.

Leserkommentarer på Document er gjenstand for moderering, som ikke skjer kontinuerlig og under enhver omstendighet ikke om natten. Vi ønsker en respektfull tone uten personangrep, sleivete språk eller flammende retorikk. Vis særlig nøkternhet når temaet er følsomt. Begrenset redigering av skjemmende detaljer kan finne sted. Skriv til debatt@document.no dersom du ikke forstår hvorfor en kommentar uteblir. Se her for nybegynnerhjelp.