Ber om at Sarrazin sparkes fra styret for sentralbanken

Hans Rustad

Thilo Sarrazin har pådratt seg enorm vrede hos eliten som styrer Tyskland med sine frittalende uttalelser om den reelle tilstanden i landet. Sarrazin har påpekt at en voksende tyrkisk befolkning er noe helt annet enn feks. den jødiske, med sin store kreativitet.

Det later til at Sarrazin har truffet eliten på dens ømmeste punkt: jødene ble sendt i ovnene og nå forbyr politisk korrekthet å kritisere en etnisk gruppe som ikke vil la seg integrere og tilfører lite økonomisk. Sarrazin har våget å si at dette ikke er en bærekraftig utvikling. Samtidig har han sagt at Tyskland aldri vil komme over tapet av jødene. Helt konkret: Berlin blir aldri den samme, og kommer aldri over tapet av 160.000 jøder.

Dette utlegges som antisemittisme.

Nå ber sjefen for Sentralbanken den tyske presidenten om å avskjedige Sarrazin fra styret for banken. Angela Merkel var den som foreslo at Sarrazin skulle sparkes. Det tyder på politisk blindhet. Sarrazin er enormt populær på grasrota. Hvis han sparkes vil det illustrere den store kløften mellom elite og folk, som nå går over hele Europa. Det er ikke bra for demokratiet.

Germany’s Bundesbank says it will ask Christian Wulff, the country’s president, to dismiss Thilo Sarrazin, a board member who caused outrage by saying Jews shared “a certain gene” and Muslims were unwilling to fit into German society.

The unprecedented step by the German central bank was meant to demonstrate the resolve of its head, Axel Weber, whose authority is under scrutiny as he and the German government pursue a behind-the-scenes campaign to make him the next president of the European Central Bank.

Pressure on the fiercely independent Bundesbank to take action has risen since Sunday when Angela Merkel, the chancellor, urged the Frankfurt-based institution to discuss Mr Sarrazin’s statements, made during a public relations drive before the launch of a book on immigration.

In a terse statement after three days of deliberation, Mr Sarrazin’s five colleagues on the Bundesbank board said their unanimous decision to seek his dismissal was “fully supported” by the bank’s corporate governance expert.

The central bank distanced itself from Mr Sarrazin on Monday and suggested that he had broken its code of ethics and public trust by “damaging the image of the Bundesbank”.

The German president’s office said Mr Wulff – who had publicly reminded the Bundesbank that Germany’s reputation was at stake – would review the central bank’s request and not comment on the matter until he reached a decision.

Ms Merkel, the first person to suggest grounds for dismissal by arguing that Mr Sarrazin’s comments damaged the central bank’s reputation, said through a spokesman that she had “taken note of the Bundesbank’s independent decision with great respect”.

But government officials also conceded that Mr Weber’s decision was not without its risks. Although a case could be made for Mr Sarrazin damaging the Bundesbank’s reputation, some legal experts held that his failings were insufficient to justify sacking him, one said.


Bundesbank calls for dismissal of Sarrazin

Leserkommentarer på Document er gjenstand for moderering, som ikke skjer kontinuerlig og under enhver omstendighet ikke om natten. Vi ønsker en respektfull tone uten personangrep, sleivete språk eller flammende retorikk. Vis særlig nøkternhet når temaet er følsomt. Begrenset redigering av skjemmende detaljer kan finne sted. Skriv til kontakt@document.no dersom du ikke forstår hvorfor en kommentar uteblir.

  • S.A. Høstmark

    I artikkelen over heter at det Sarrazin sier “… at Tyskland aldri vil komme over tapet av jødene. Helt konkret: Berlin blir aldri den samme, og kommer aldri over tapet av 160.000 jøder. Dette utlegges som antisemittisme.

    Kan noen hjelpe meg til å forstå hvordan hans uttalese er å oppfatte som antisemittisme? og hvorfoten jødisk organisasjon reagerer så sterkt?
    Help!

  • Ola Q. Nordmann

    @Høstmark.

    John Derbyshire svarer på begge dine spørsmål i et intervju på jewcy.com (lenke: http://www.jewcy.com/dialogue/02-27/wrestling_with_derbyshires_law , fra tredje paragraf og nedover):

    “I have somewhere formulated Derbyshire’s Law, which asserts that: “ANYTHING WHATSOEVER said by a Gentile about Jews will be perceived as antisemitic by someone, somewhere.” I have experienced the truth of this many times. Further, I have the awful example of William Cash before me. Cash wrote an article titled “Kings of the Deal” for The Spectator back in 1994, pointing out, in a perfectly inoffensive way (and, of course, quite truly) that lots of Hollywood movers and shakers are Jewish. You can google the consequences.

    Why is Derbyshire’s Law true? I am not sure. It seems to me that Jews have a very strong preference that their Jewishness not be noticed. They want to “pass” as much as possible.

    I remember thinking how strange it was, in that special issue of The New Republic devoted to The Bell Curve, that Leon Wieseltier should declare himself “repulsed” at the suggestion, by Charles Murray and Richard J. Herrnstein, that Jews have higher intelligence than Gentiles.

    “What an odd thing to say!” I thought to myself. “Why, if someone were to say that my common-ancestry group was smarter than others, I’d be proud!” But that was a very Jewish reaction on Wieseltier’s part. It’s not hard to see why this should be so, historically.”

    Moderne historie gir svaret på hvorfor ikke alle jøder liker at det påpekes at “jødisk” også kan være en etnisk identitet.

  • Petter H

    Jeg skjønte ikke det der jeg eller, var det en skrivefeil?