Sharia-domstoler innført i Storbritannia

Hans Rustad

Stor­bri­tan­nia har fått sine offi­si­elt god­kjente sharia-domstoler i seks byer og flere er under­veis. Dom­sto­le­nes ved­tak har lovens kraft og vil bli backet opp av bri­tiske domstoler.

Mus­li­mer opp­da­get at de kunne bruke loven om vold­gift, og myn­dig­he­tene stilte seg posi­tive. For­ut­satt at par­tene fri­vil­lig søker seg til domstolen.

Virk­som­he­ten begynte i august 2007, og man har dømt i rundt 100 saker.

Sharia-domstolene døm­mer i saker som angår sivile for­hold: ekte­skap, barne­for­de­ling, arv, og vold i hjemmet.

I en bestemt arve­strid fikk jen­tene halv­par­ten av brø­dene etter å ha gått til en sharia-domstol. Dette er i Stor­bri­tan­nia, og det skjer med myn­dig­he­te­nes velsignelse.

Rulings issued by a network of five sha­ria courts are enfor­ce­able with the full power of the judi­cial sys­tem, through the county courts or High Court.

Pre­viously, the rulings of sha­ria courts in Bri­tain could not be enfor­ced, and depen­ded on volun­tary com­pli­ance among Muslims.

It has now emer­ged that sha­ria courts with these powers have been set up in Lon­don, Bir­ming­ham, Brad­ford and Man­ches­ter with the network’s hea­dquar­ters in Nunea­ton, War­wick­shire. Two more courts are being plan­ned for Glas­gow and Edinburgh.

Sheikh Faiz-ul-Aqtab Sid­diqi, whose Mus­lim Arbi­tra­tion Tri­bu­nal runs the courts, said he had taken advan­tage of a clause in the Arbi­tra­tion Act 1996.

Under the act, the sha­ria courts are clas­si­fied as arbi­tra­tion tri­bu­nals. The rulings of arbi­tra­tion tri­bu­nals are bin­ding in law, pro­vi­ded that both par­ties in the dis­pute agree to give it the power to rule on their case.

Reak­sjo­nene på dom­sto­lene er til dels sterke.

Douglas Mur­ray, the direc­tor of the Centre for Social Cohe­sion, said: “I think it’s appal­ling. I don’t think arbi­tra­tion that is done by sha­ria should ever be endor­sed or enfor­ced by the Bri­tish state.”

There are con­cerns that women who agree to go to tri­bu­nal courts are get­ting worse deals because Isla­mic law favours men.

Sid­diqi said that in a recent inhe­ri­tance dis­pute hand­led by the court in Nunea­ton, the estate of a Mid­lands man was divi­ded between three daugh­ters and two sons.

The jud­ges on the panel gave the sons twice as much as the daugh­ters, in accor­dance with sha­ria. Had the family gone to a nor­mal Bri­tish court, the daugh­ters would have got equal amounts.

In the six cases of dome­stic vio­lence, Sid­diqi said the jud­ges orde­red the hus­bands to take anger mana­ge­ment clas­ses and ment­oring from com­mu­nity elders. There was no furt­her punishment.

In each case, the women sub­se­quently wit­hd­rew the com­pla­ints they had lod­ged with the police and the police stop­ped their investigations.

Mus­li­mene viser til det jødiske sam­funn som har hatt slike dom­sto­ler i 100 år.

Inayat Bung­la­wala, assi­stant secretary-general of the Mus­lim Coun­cil of Bri­tain, said: “The MCB sup­ports these tri­bu­nals. If the Jewish courts are allowed to flou­rish, so must the sha­ria ones.”

Revealed: UK’s first offi­cial sha­ria courts


Om du ikke følger Document på sosiale media kan du følge oss på e-post.

Donere engangsbeløp?Kan du forplikte deg til fast betaling?

Penger kan også doneres til kontonummer 15030249981.

Leserkommentarer på Document er gjenstand for moderering, som ikke skjer kontinuerlig og under enhver omstendighet ikke om natten. Vi ønsker en respektfull tone uten personangrep, sleivete språk eller flammende retorikk. Vis særlig nøkternhet når temaet er følsomt. Begrenset redigering av skjemmende detaljer kan finne sted. Skriv til debatt@document.no dersom du ikke forstår hvorfor en kommentar uteblir. Se her for nybegynnerhjelp.