Mordere kan gå fri

Hans Rustad

En dom­stol av lor­der i Over­hu­set sier at dom­fel­lel­sen av en mann for dob­belt drap ikke er gyl­dig fordi den byg­ger på ano­nyme vit­ner. Lor­dene for­lan­ger at alle vit­ner møter til­talte ansikt til ansikt i ret­ten. Poli­tiet er opp­rørt. Noen av Stor­bri­tan­nias ver­ste kri­mi­nelle kan gå fri.

The law lords ruling came in the case of Iain Davis, who was jai­led for life in 2004 for mur­de­ring two men at a New Year’s Eve party in Hack­ney, east London.

Seven wit­nes­ses clai­med to be in fear of their lives if it became known that they had given evi­dence against Davis. Three wit­nes­ses iden­ti­fied him as the gunman.

Davis clai­med that he was the vic­tim of false accu­sa­tions from a jealous for­mer part­ner but the defence could not be put to the jury – so as to pro­tect the wit­nes­ses’ identities.

Lord Bing­ham of Corn­hill, the senior law lord, said that it was a “long estab­lis­hed prin­ciple of the Eng­lish com­mon law” that, sub­ject to some excep­tions, an accu­sed should be con­fronted by his accu­sers so that he was able to “cross-examine them and chal­lenge their evidence”.

The ruling stated: “No con­vic­tion should be based solely or to a deci­sive extent upon the state­ments and testi­mony of ano­ny­mous witnesses.”

Men poli­tiet sier at folk ikke tør vitne mot de far­ligste kri­mi­nelle. Ano­nyme vit­ner er eneste måten. Ved­ta­ket i Over­hu­set kan bety at Davis slip­per ut.

t deals a severe blow to plans by Jacqui Smith, the Home Secre­tary, to extend ano­ny­mity pro­tec­tion to wit­nes­ses giving evi­dence against gang mem­bers. It also under­mi­nes pro­po­sals set out by Louise Casey, the for­mer head of the Government’s anti-social beha­viour unit, to extend court ano­ny­mity to elderly and disab­led vic­tims of crime.

Assis­te­rende politi­sjef ved Metropolitan-poliitet, John Yates, ber regje­rin­gen gripe inn med nødtiltak.

Police now believe that up to 40 indi­vi­duals in Lon­don alone con­victed of mur­der or other serious cri­mes could appeal and walk free if the wit­nes­ses refuse to reveal their iden­tity in a retrial.

Dozens more pre­vious cases will be affected nation­wide and at least three tri­als cur­rently being heard in Eng­land are on the verge of col­lapse over the legal argument.

This is potenti­ally disastrous,” Mr Yates said. “A lot of good work is being undone, and this will play out so badly in terms of those we are try­ing to reachout to in com­mu­nities. It almost feels like we have bro­ken our word.

To see cle­arly guilty people walking free would be just awful.

Spec­ial measu­res are only used in the most extreme cases, which means these are our most dan­gerous cri­mi­nals, people who have been jai­led for up to 40 years. And they could be walking free.”

Police have iden­ti­fied an ini­tial list of 16 men who may appeal because of the ruling.

They have been con­victed of some of Britain’s most bru­tal mur­ders in recent years on the basis of evi­dence from ano­ny­mous witnesses.

They are ser­ving an average of more than 30 years in jail but could appeal and have their con­vic­tions quashed.


John Yates, assi­stant com­mis­sio­ner of the Metro­po­li­tan Police, fears kil­lers will go free

Even our jud­ges seem drawn to extremism




Om du ikke følger Document på sosiale media kan du følge oss på e-post.

Donere engangsbeløp?Kan du forplikte deg til fast betaling?

Penger kan også doneres til kontonummer 15030249981. Du kan også støtte oss ved å kjøpe bøker eller varer.

Leserkommentarer på Document er gjenstand for moderering, som ikke skjer kontinuerlig og under enhver omstendighet ikke om natten. Vi ønsker en respektfull tone uten personangrep, sleivete språk eller flammende retorikk. Vis særlig nøkternhet når temaet er følsomt. Begrenset redigering av skjemmende detaljer kan finne sted. Skriv til debatt@document.no dersom du ikke forstår hvorfor en kommentar uteblir. Se her for nybegynnerhjelp.