Religiøst diktatur i Sør-Irak

Hans Rustad

Shia-partier inn­fø­rer strenge isla­mis­tiske reg­ler i Sør-Irak. Kles­drakt kon­trol­le­res, bare reli­giøs musikk til­la­tes, kvin­ner skal til­d­kek­kes osv. og den som ikke er reli­giøs nok kan få pro­ble­mer. Flere av inn­byg­gerne kla­ger. De er reli­giøse, men liker ikke diktatur.

Fire shei­k­her fra sør kom til Reu­ters for å for­telle hvor­dan for­hol­dene er blitt. De sier det er fryk­ten som hers­ker. Folk tør ikke si sin mening. Selv med­ar­bei­dere av storaya­tol­lah Ali al-Sistani er blitt drept.

Fear rules the stre­ets now,” said one of the shei­khs. “We can­not speak our minds, people are not allowed to oppose them. They would imme­dia­tely dis­appear or get kil­led. The evi­dence of that is I am tal­king about it but can­not use my name.”

The fear is not unfoun­ded -- two pro­vin­cial governors and a police chief were blown up by roadside bombs in August, appa­rent vic­tims of infigh­ting between the Shi’ite par­ties for poli­ti­cal domi­nance in the region, source of most of Iraq’s oil wealth.
..
The shei­khs said the con­ser­va­tive reli­gious atti­tu­des meant only reli­gious music was now allowed to be played in pub­lic places and dan­cing was for­bid­den, as was drin­king alco­hol. Women were also har­assed for wea­ring clot­hing deemed inappropriate.

Pho­to­graphs of secu­lar poli­ti­cal lea­ders like for­mer inte­rim Prime Minis­ter Iyad Allawi could not be dis­played in shops and other pub­lic areas.

Street com­mittees that were set up to pro­tect neigh­bor­hoods from al Qaeda attacks were being misu­sed to spy on resi­dents and report infrac­tions to the militias and the police, they said.

The people of the south are reli­gious, we are belie­vers, but at the same time we like to live our lives and we like free­dom,” said one sheikh.

De to par­ti­ene Supreme Iraqi Isla­mic Coun­cil (SIIC), tid­li­gere SCIRI, og beve­gel­sen til Muqtadah al-Sadr domi­ne­rer. De har hver sine milit­ser, noe som gjør det far­lig å legge seg ut med dem.

Begge har sterke bånd til Iran.

De lokale shei­kene føler seg marginalisert.

The growing strength of the par­ties in the south has weake­ned some secu­lar tri­bal lea­ders and exclu­ded them from power struc­tu­res, a source of patro­nage and revenues.

Some say the Shi’ites are lucky because they are now ruling Iraq, but that is wrong. It is the Isla­mist Shi’ites who are ruling Iraq. Their vic­tory was a curse for us,” said one sheikh.

Det er mis­nøye med Irans økende inn­fly­telse. Ira­kerne mis­li­ker inn­blan­ding, og Irans inn­fly­telse kan gi et backlash.

SIIC and the Sadrists are seen by the shei­khs as impor­ting a con­ser­va­tive brand of Shi’ism from neigh­bo­ring Iran, which U.S. offi­ci­als accuse of arming Shi’ite militias to use as prox­ies to enforce their influ­ence in the south.

We are suf­fe­ring from two occu­pa­tions -- Ame­rica and Iran. We have told Ame­ri­can offi­ci­als this and we have met some of them, but they are not liste­ning to us,” one sheikh complained.

Some tri­bes were tal­king about taking up arms against the Isla­mist par­ties, but the tri­bal lea­ders said they feared this would unleash a blood­bath that would desta­bi­lize the south.

reu­ters


Om du ikke følger Document på sosiale media kan du følge oss på e-post.

Donere engangsbeløp?Kan du forplikte deg til fast betaling?

Penger kan også doneres til kontonummer 15030249981.

Leserkommentarer på Document er gjenstand for moderering, som ikke skjer kontinuerlig og under enhver omstendighet ikke om natten. Vi ønsker en respektfull tone uten personangrep, sleivete språk eller flammende retorikk. Vis særlig nøkternhet når temaet er følsomt. Begrenset redigering av skjemmende detaljer kan finne sted. Skriv til debatt@document.no dersom du ikke forstår hvorfor en kommentar uteblir. Se her for nybegynnerhjelp.